Newsletters - Past Issues

Market and Wildfire News Update January 18 2025

 

Fire Insurance   A must in today's world

Market news also included in today's musing

 

The 2024 December jobs report came out last Friday and it showed an increase of 256,000 jobs following a 212,000 gain in November. Analysts expected 165,000 created jobs for December so saints be praised, the country seems robust!

Not so fast said Wall Street and the Dow subsequently shed  a whopping 696 points on the day sending traders into the local bars at closing to gulp down a couple of double martinis to ease the pain of it all. So good economic news causes the market to crater?

How can that be you say?

Let me explain.

I miss the olden days. Back when sanity ruled Mr. Market, good economic news meant positive market movement. That was before the governmental money guys tried to harness the winds of supply and demand that drove the market in the direction it wanted to go.

Which is to say let it freely meander to and fro in response to a healthy and vibrant U.S. economy that was the envy of markets everywhere.

So the question becomes what happened since then where now good news on the economy causes the stock market to bleed red and bad news might cause a market rally?

What happened was the repeated interventions by the Federal Reserve (the FED) nearly every time the markets got a cold. So many times has the FED intervened, messed with, manipulated and basically tried to steer the market with monetary (money) injections, the knee jerk reaction by investors has now become what will the FED do in response to any economic news that comes out.

Bad news might cause the FED to juice the market by lowering interest rates, making credit easier, and bailing out a bank or two. Good economic news might cause the FED to do the opposite and tighten up on the money spigots causing markets to pull back.

Investors now seem more concerned with FED response to a positive or negative economic statistic than the actual health of the economy itself. What an odd investing world we now live in.

In other news, the Los Angeles fires no doubt will mean higher insurance rates for us homeowners.

Just last month, I penned an article discussing the solvency of the California Fair Plan insurance entity and how they might be, self-admittedly, one large fire away from insolvency. Well, the news is out the latest fires in Southern California might be the costliest insurance event in their history. I have seen social media chat suggesting Cal Fair is in shambles. I can say as a Cal Fair agent, they are still up and running and, at least now, seem no worse for wear. I have no way of knowing their current financial picture, but they continue to communicate and operations continue, at least from an agent’s point of view.  In the article, I mentioned Cal Fair may have to instigate assessment charges on policies throughout the state to cover shortfalls. Much like a property tax bill where you get an invoice for a new road or what have you, a fire assessment would send you a bill out of the blue to help cover costs.

In the middle of the crisis, it’s difficult to tell how this will all wash out. But my guess is the Federal and or state governments along with the insurance companies will all have to contribute massive amounts of money to cover the costs of these fires. A bail out by somebody is in the cards.

A bail IN, where you and I will be asked to contribute is also a possibility.

In conclusion, whatever happens, if you thought insurance rates of all kinds were high now, it’s not rocket science to foresee even higher rates are in our future.

For now, let us offer our prayers and support for those victims and their families, our first responders and all those involved in bringing this horrid event to a close.

Watching the markets so you dont have to    

(end)    

(As mentioned please use the below disclaimer exactly) THANKS   (Regulations)    

This article expresses the opinion of Marc Cuniberti and is not meant as investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any securities, nor represents the opinion of any bank, investment firm or RIA, nor this media outlet, its staff, members or underwriters. Mr. Cuniberti holds a B.A. in Economics with honors, 1979, and California Insurance License #0L34249 His insurance agency is BAP INC. insurance services.  Email: news@moneymanagementradio.com

 

 

Medicare, Annuities and Fire coverage.

Retirement solutions and loss prevention

(530) 559 - 1214

 


 

UPDATE MARKETS AND CAL FAIR FIRE UPDATE

 

 

The 2024 December jobs report came out last Friday and it showed an increase of 256,000 jobs following a 212,000 gain in November. Analysts expected 165,000 created jobs for December so saints be praised, the country seems robust!

Not so fast said Wall Street and the Dow subsequently shed  a whopping 696 points on the day sending traders into the local bars at closing to gulp down a couple of double martinis to ease the pain of it all. So good economic news causes the market to crater?

How can that be you say?

Let me explain.

I miss the olden days. Back when sanity ruled Mr. Market, good economic news meant positive market movement. That was before the governmental money guys tried to harness the winds of supply and demand that drove the market in the direction it wanted to go.

Which is to say let it freely meander to and fro in response to a healthy and vibrant U.S. economy that was the envy of markets everywhere.

So the question becomes what happened since then where now good news on the economy causes the stock market to bleed red and bad news might cause a market rally?

What happened was the repeated interventions by the Federal Reserve (the FED) nearly every time the markets got a cold. So many times has the FED intervened, messed with, manipulated and basically tried to steer the market with monetary (money) injections, the knee jerk reaction by investors has now become what will the FED do in response to any economic news that comes out.

Bad news might cause the FED to juice the market by lowering interest rates, making credit easier, and bailing out a bank or two. Good economic news might cause the FED to do the opposite and tighten up on the money spigots causing markets to pull back.

Investors now seem more concerned with FED response to a positive or negative economic statistic than the actual health of the economy itself. What an odd investing world we now live in.

In other news, the Los Angeles fires no doubt will mean higher insurance rates for us homeowners.

Just last month, I penned an article discussing the solvency of the California Fair Plan insurance entity and how they might be, self-admittedly, one large fire away from insolvency. Well, the news is out the latest fires in Southern California might be the costliest insurance event in their history. I have seen social media chat suggesting Cal Fair is in shambles. I can say as a Cal Fair agent, they are still up and running and, at least now, seem no worse for wear. I have no way of knowing their current financial picture, but they continue to communicate and operations continue, at least from an agent’s point of view.  In the article, I mentioned Cal Fair may have to instigate assessment charges on policies throughout the state to cover shortfalls. Much like a property tax bill where you get an invoice for a new road or what have you, a fire assessment would send you a bill out of the blue to help cover costs.

In the middle of the crisis, it’s difficult to tell how this will all wash out. But my guess is the Federal and or state governments along with the insurance companies will all have to contribute massive amounts of money to cover the costs of these fires. A bail out by somebody is in the cards.

A bail IN, where you and I will be asked to contribute is also a possibility.

In conclusion, whatever happens, if you thought insurance rates of all kinds were high now, it’s not rocket science to foresee even higher rates are in our future.

For now, let us offer our prayers and support for those victims and their families, our first responders and all those involved in bringing this horrid event to a close.

Watching the markets so you dont have to    

 

This article expresses the opinion of Marc Cuniberti and is not meant as investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any securities, nor represents the opinion of any bank, investment firm or RIA, nor this media outlet, its staff, members or underwriters. Mr. Cuniberti holds a B.A. in Economics with honors, 1979, and California Insurance License #0L34249 His insurance agency is BAP INC. insurance services.  Email: news@moneymanagementradio.com

 


 

Update Novo NOrdisk Jan 6 2025

 

Those new weight loss drugs!

 

 

The biggest talking point in the pharmaceutical industry at the moment revolves around treatments known as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists. GLP-1 agonists are used to treat diabetes and chronic weight management, although research suggests these medications could have other applications in areas such as sleep apnea, kidney disease, and cardiovascular complications.

At the moment, the hottest GLP-1 treatment is Ozempic. Danish pharmaceutical leader Novo Nordisk (NYSE: NVO) is the brains behind Ozempic, as well as sibling GLP-1 medications including Wegovy, Rybelsus, and Saxenda. You'd think with such a robust lineup of options surrounding one of healthcare's biggest opportunities, shares of Novo Nordisk would be soaring.

However, this is far from the case. I'm going to break down why a recent piece of news from Novo Nordisk caused the stock to tank. Moreover, I'll explore if now is an opportunity to buy the dip, or run for the hills.

What happened with Novo Nordisk stock?

On Dec. 20, Novo announced results from a phase 3 clinical trial surrounding one of its new GLP-1 candidates, called CagriSema. The name CagriSema is simply an amalgamation of the two primary ingredients in the drug: cagrilintide and semaglutide. Of note, semaglutide is the leading ingredient in Ozempic, Wegovy, and Rybelsus. Per the results of the study, patients who took CagriSema reached an averaged weight reduction of up to 22.7%.

As of Dec. 30, shares of Novo has declined by nearly 17% following the announcement of the CagriSema study. Clearly, investors were not pleased with the outcome of this trial.

Why is this development important?

You're probably wondering why investors reacted the way they did following Novo's latest clinical update. In my eyes, there are two main reasons:

Novo's management had set a benchmark of 25% average weight reduction for the CagriSema study. As mentioned, the entire population of patients taking CagriSema only experienced about a 23% reduction in weight. It is important to note, however, that roughly 40% of patients "reached a weight loss of 25% or more."

The second reason I think investors were spooked by the CagriSema results is related to a recent study published by Novo's top rival in the weight loss space, Eli Lilly. Lilly is the maker of GLP-1 treatments Mounjaro and Zepbound. For comparison’s sake, Mounjaro is essentially Lilly's answer to Ozempic, while Zepbound is the company's response to Wegovy. In a study published on Dec. 4, Lilly found that patients taking Zepbound experienced an average weight reduction of 20% versus those who took Wegovy reached an average weight loss of roughly 14%. When taking these figures into account, there's an argument to be made that CagriSema is not superior to Zepbound, leading some investors to question the strength of Novo's clinical pipeline.

Is Novo Nordisk stock a buy right now?

On the surface, the results from the CagriSema trial appear underwhelming. But as I often encourage investors to do, it's important to zoom out and consider the bigger picture.

In a study from 2021, patients taking semaglutide experienced an average weight reduction of 14.9% over the course of a 68-week trial period. So even though CagriSema fell short of its goal in the phase 3 trial, there's an argument to be made that it is still a stronger treatment when benchmarked against Semaglutide (i.e., Wegovy and Ozempic).

To me, I see the precipitous sell-off in Novo stock as emotional, panic-driven behavior. At the end of the day, I think CagriSema will become a blockbuster drug for Novo in the long run. For now, the company simply needs to go back to the drawing board and tweak some of its research and development (R&D) protocols in order to improve CagriSema's efficacy before it reaches approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Right now, Novo stock is trading at a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple of 22.5 -- its lowest level in well over a year. I think now is a terrific opportunity to scoop up shares of Novo on the dip and lower your cost basis if you're an existing investor, or initiate a position if you've been following the company for a while.

All told, Novo's long-term thesis still holds up, and I think the company will remain a leader in the GLP-1 space for years to come.

 


 

Update Jan 1 2025 Happy New Year

 

Happy New Year  !

Wishing you all the best in the coming year

 

 

I have penned a few Money Matters articles on those big box stores and the little mom and pop local stores we all like to support and how they coexist with each other.

The first article centered on the idea the big box stores like Costco, Walmart, Home Depot and Lowes were killing the small local stores in neighborhoods around the country.  The reasons were lower overhead cost per purchase, better selection, ease of access (the one stop shopping experience), of course, price.

The subsequent article a few years later turned the tide on the big box store with the subject being that they themselves were now dealing with their own threat of existence because of the online retailer Amazon.

Some big box stores were slow to react while others like Walmart, Target, and others took a quick lesson from Amazon and started their own online services.

The big box stores also had an advantage. Buyers could actually view the item at the store. When shopping online, this was not possible.

Amazon countered that concern by implementing a no-questions asked, super easy return policy.

When CoVid arrived and the governments of the world decided to implement shutdowns of just about everything, this further exasperated the plight of the in-person shopping experience and put even more pressure on local establishments. As the shopping environment has progressed along, the mom and pop stores, those that survived that is, did have a leg to stand on, albeit a wobbly one.

We found out that people care about their local stores and many didn’t mind paying a few pennies extra for the local experience. Many mom and pops met their shoppers half way with price concessions making sure the “few extra pennies” didn’t turn into “many extra dollars” as people still have to watch their budgets. The severe inflationary pressures of the last few years obviously hasn’t help local stores to keep the doors open but they are a stubborn bunch as well as some of their local supporters luckily are a compassionate bunch.

That being as it may, some local vendors resist dropping prices and rely on the local shopping experience as something no online retailer or big box store can compete with.

For some store owners however, how to compete with the large corporate outlets still eludes them.

I once shopped at a small store in my local township Nevada City that was tucked away in a quaint hallway like shopping area in an historic old building that had only a few small stores in it.

The area also contained a Persian Rug outlet, a gourmet chocolatier as well as a few other specialty shops. The historic building environment and the tucked away shops offered a somewhat magical experience so I frequented a small gift boutique during birthdays, Valentine’s Day, and Christmas. The store was very small, had a very limited selection and the prices were high, but I liked the owner, wanted to support the shop and was always warmly welcomed.

After shopping there three or four times a year for more than a decade, I bought my wife a blouse there one day and when her birthday arrived, the wife tried it on. Me, being a clueless husband when it came to sizing, had of course bought the wrong size. I should have known better than to try and buy clothes for the opposite sex but I felt brave that day so what the heck.

In any case, the blouse didn’t fit so I went back to my little boutique and asked if the owner had a larger size. The owner said no and when I asked for a refund, she said the store policy was on a credit. Yea, I know this is the policy of many a store but seeing as I went out of my way more times than I would care to shop there and support her, she still refused to refund my money and stuck to the credit offer. Seeing nothing else, I gently reminded her that I would of course be back but would prefer the refund, she stuck to her guns. I thanked her and left the store and never returned.

In conclusion, our local shops are a great place to engage with our neighbors, make a pleasant day of shopping and walking the town and supporting our small town purveyors. But there is a give and take that should always be considered by the small shop owner. Don’t act like a big box or mega store with stringent policies that can’t be bent because you’re too focused on the almighty buck. We shop there because we’re neighbors, so treat us as such.

Watching the markets so you dont have to    

(end)    

(As mentioned please use the below disclaimer exactly) THANKS   (Regulations)    

This article expresses the opinion of Marc Cuniberti and is not meant as investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any securities, nor represents the opinion of any bank, investment firm or RIA, nor this media outlet, its staff, members or underwriters. Mr. Cuniberti holds a B.A. in Economics with honors, 1979, and California Insurance License #0L34249 His insurance agency is BAP INC. insurance services.  Email: news@moneymanagementradio.com

 

 

Call me (530) 559 1214

 


 

Can Bitcoin replace the US DOLLAR UPDATE DECEMBER 29 2024+

 

US DOLLAR OR BITCOIN 

 

Crypto currency comes in many forms. Bitcoin being the most notable, there are many others that go by names like Ethereum, Ripple, Stellar Loomis, EOS and Lightcoin to name a few. There are an estimated 10,000 crypto currencies now in existence.

The idea behind crypto is it is anywhere and everywhere there is internet access. Not controlled by any one government, crypto is “mined” by using mathematical formulas called block chain technology. Wikipedia describes it as: “A cryptocurrency is a digital asset designed to work as a medium of exchange that uses strong cryptography to secure financial transactions, control the creation of additional units, and verify the transfer of assets”.

As a currency, crypto currencies meets some of the characteristics a medium of exchange must possess. A currency must be hard to replicate, be divisible, recognizable, have uniformity, be portable, have acceptability and maintain a store of value. On the first six characteristics, crypto coins could be argued fit the bill nicely. My objection is having issue with the last characteristic, maintaining a store of value.

Its goes without saying that at times, the price of crypto currencies can vary tremendously. Lately, that has been an understatement.

Stories of skyrocketing prices and subsequent roller coaster like plunges are common. Bitcoin itself briefly breached 100,000.00 a coin just a few weeks ago.

Although a rising price may convince some investors to believe crypto might make an acceptable currency replacement, the very fact it often moves so violently violates the store of value characteristic a useable currency must possess.

Store of value means both the buyer and seller of the currency must have faith in its stability. Stability meaning it doesn’t go up or down much. Certainly the buyer of crypto relishes the meteoric rise when it occurs, but like all things money, there is always someone else on the other side of the trade.

If a buyer of crypto makes an overnight fortune on a price spike, the seller of that very same crypto lost an equal amount in value.

For to buy crypto, one must have exchanged something else for it.

For example, if it is another currency that is exchanged, the person who sold the crypto now holds a currency that has fallen in value by an equal amount.

Given the recent price instability of Bitcoin, the very definition of maintaining a store of value is almost nonexistent and therefore, at this place in time, Bitcoin cannot be considered a usable currency replacement.

Another attraction of crypto is the fact no one or no one government can shut it down. Again from Wikipedia: “It is a decentralized digital currency without a central bank or single administrator…………”.

Since the internet is worldwide and unstoppable, the thinking goes that crypto coins can’t be confiscated by meddling governments.

However, governments of the world don’t have to confiscate crypto currencies to stop their usage. All they have to do is shutdown the exchange websites that trade them. Sounds unlikely but many countries have already done so.      

Quite simply, if your country of residence decides it doesn’t want you trading crypto, it can shut down all the ways you can access it.

Internet workarounds are certainly possible, but to the average Joe, cyber space backdoors may be difficult to access.

Central governments will always strive to maintain strict controls over their respective currencies to insure their viability.

A country’s currency is the lifeblood of their economy so controlling it insures the ability to use the government check book, which means the ability to deficit spend without restriction.

History has proven time and time again a government will insure its currency remains valid and is not usurped by another. This would obviously include curtailing the use of Bitcoin or any other currency whose ownership becomes too wide spread.

That said, to say central governments aren’t fully aware of the threat crypto coins may present to their specific currencies would to be more than naïve.

The U.S. government is already looking into issuing its own version of cyber coin called the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). President elect Trump has also indicated the U.S. government is looking to expand its control of the Bitcoin market by establishing a Bitcoin reserve of its own.

The U.S. is not alone. The issue is being discussed among central banks worldwide.

That said, in this analysts opinion, it’s only a matter of time before governments bring down a harder hammer on the entire cyber coin phenomenon in order to insure continued control of all things money.

  “Watching the markets so you dont have to    

(end)    

(As mentioned please use the below disclaimer exactly) THANKS   (Regulations)    

This article expresses the opinion of Marc Cuniberti and is not meant as investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any securities, nor represents the opinion of any bank, investment firm or RIA, nor this media outlet, its staff, members or underwriters. Mr. Cuniberti holds a B.A. in Economics with honors, 1979, and California Insurance License #0L34249 His insurance agency is BAP INC. insurance services.  Email: news@moneymanagementradio.com

 

 

Need Fire Insurance   - Ya its a mess

But not for us

Call me   (530) 559 1214

CAL INS LIC OL34249